fabp3 (Sanying Ltd)
Structured Review

Fabp3, supplied by Sanying Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fabp3/pmc13124441-68-24-28?v=Sanying+Ltd
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Atorvastatin Attenuates Vancomycin-Induced Nephrotoxicity via PPARα-Associated Regulation of SLC Transporters"
Article Title: Atorvastatin Attenuates Vancomycin-Induced Nephrotoxicity via PPARα-Associated Regulation of SLC Transporters
Journal: Drug Design, Development and Therapy
doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S571916
Figure Legend Snippet: Validation of DEGs associated with the PPAR signaling pathway by qRT-PCR. ( A-H ) Validation of DEGs related to the PPAR signaling pathway, including CYP4A10 , ACOX2 , SLC27A2 , FABP3 , ACAA1B , APOC3 , CYP4A31 , and GK (panels A-H, respectively). The data are presented as mean ± SD, n = 6. Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired Student’s t -test for comparisons between the VCM model group and the VCM + ATO (10 mg/kg) group. In transcriptome sequencing, compared with the VCM model group, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; in qRT-PCR, compared with the VCM model group, # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001.
Techniques Used: Biomarker Discovery, Quantitative RT-PCR, Sequencing
Figure Legend Snippet: Validation of DEGs related to the PPAR signaling pathway and SLC-mediated transmembrane transport by Western blot.Validation of DEGs related to the PPAR signaling pathway by Western blot. ( A ) Western blot analysis of FABP3, ACOX2, and FATP2 protein expression in renal tissues; ( B ) Western blot analysis of OAT1, OCT2, OAT3, and MATE1 protein expression in renal tissues.
Techniques Used: Biomarker Discovery, Western Blot, Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: Mechanistic study of the protective effects of ATO against VIN. ( A ) GW6471 (10 μM) reverses the cytoprotective effect of ATO against VCM-induced injury; ( B ) qRT-PCR analysis of PPARα pathway downstream target genes; ( C ) qRT-PCR analysis of SLC transporter genes. The data are presented as mean ± SD, n = 3. Statistical analyses were performed using Tukey’s post hoc test for all pairwise comparisons. Compared with the CONTROL group, *** P < 0.001; compared with the VCM model group, # P < 0.05, ## P < 0.01, ### P < 0.001; compared with the VCM + ATO (10 μM) group, & P < 0.05, && P < 0.01, &&& P < 0.001. ( A ) CONTROL vs. VCM, P < 0.0001; VCM vs. VCM + ATO (10 μM), P = 0.0002; VCM + ATO (10 μM) vs. VCM + ATO (10 μM) + GW6471, P = 0.0032. (B-FABP3) VCM vs. VCM + ATO (10 μM), P = 0.0028; VCM + ATO (10 μM) vs. VCM + ATO (10 μM) + GW6471, P = 0.0002. (B-AOX2) VCM vs. VCM + ATO (10 μM), P = 0.0055; VCM + ATO (10 μM) vs. VCM + ATO (10 μM) + GW6471, P = 0.0153. (B-SLC27A2) VCM vs. VCM + ATO (10 μM), P = 0.0001; VCM + ATO (10 μM) vs. VCM + ATO (10 μM) + GW6471, P < 0.0001. (C-SLC22A6) VCM vs. VCM + ATO (10 μM), P = 0.0115; VCM + ATO (10 μM) vs. VCM + ATO (10 μM) + GW6471, P = 0.0084. (C-SLC22A2) VCM vs. VCM + ATO (10 μM), P < 0.0001; VCM + ATO (10 μM) vs. VCM + ATO (10 μM) + GW6471, P = 0.0001. (C-SLC22A8) VCM vs. VCM + ATO (10 μM), P = 0.0347; VCM + ATO (10 μM) vs. VCM + ATO (10 μM) + GW6471, P = 0.0148. (C-SLC47A1) VCM vs. VCM + ATO (10 μM), P = 0.0034; VCM + ATO (10 μM) vs. VCM + ATO (10 μM) + GW6471, P = 0.0009.
Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR, Control

